A few months ago I read Alan Hirsch's new book, The Forgotten Ways: Reactivating the Missional Church. The introduction captured my attention and pointed out some things that have challenged my thinking from the moment I first read them. Hirsch tells a story of attending a seminar on missional church in which the speaker asked the question, "How many Christians do you think there were in the year AD 100?" The speaker then asked, "How many Christians do you think there were just before Constantine came on the scene, say, AD 310?" The answer is mind-boggling.
> AD 100 as few as 25,000 Christians
> AD 310 up to 20,000,000 Christians
Hirsch says that the speaker then asked a question that has haunted him to this day: "How did they do this? How did they go from being a small movement to the most significant religious force in the Roman Empire in two centuries?" Wow. That is a haunting question. However, what has haunted me is what he points out next. Hirsch points out that when attempting to answer the question of how the early church grew, one must consider several factors in the equation. What are those factors?
> They were an illegal religion throughout this period.
> They didn't have any church buildings as we know them.
> They didn't even have the Scriptures as we know them.
> They didn't have an institution or the professional form of leadership normally associated with it.
> They didn't have seeker-sensitive services, youth groups, worship bands, seminaries, commentaries, etc.
> They actually made it hard to join the church.
It is impossible to read something like that and walk away without being phased. From 25,000 to 20,000,000 in 200 years?!?! No buildings?!?! No Bible?!?! No professional leaders?!?! No bands?!?! What would we teach at our church planting conferences? Consider these things again in light of the typical conference on church planting:
> They were an illegal religion throughout this period. What would we do in place of our workshops on incorporation and 501(c)(3) and liability insurance?
> They didn't have any church buildings as we know them. What would we do in place of our workshops on building location, visibility, esthetics, building funds, etc?
> They didn't even have the Scriptures as we know them. What would we do in place of our workshops on expository preaching?
> They didn't have an institution or the professional form of leadership normally associated with it. What would we do in place of our workshops on hiring staff such as children's pastor, men's ministry leader, etc.?
> They didn't have seeker-sensitive services, youth groups, worship bands, seminaries, commentaries, etc. What would we do in place of our workshops on how to do "worship music" that is relevant?
> They actually made it hard to join the church. What would we do with our workshops on follow-up?
I guess we would have to spend our time focusing on things such as how to be hospitable to all the people who will be in your house jacking up your way of life because they won't leave and they keep bringing all of their whacked out friends over all the time. Which would probably mean that we would have to focus a lot of attention on discipleship and training people how to live out the gospel in their workplaces. If that were the case, I guess we would no longer need so many conferences at all because the work of Ephesians 5 would be carried out in local churches that were changing cities because of the gospel.
Just something to think about.........and hopefully to screw up your life like it has screwed up mine.
Technorati Tags: alan hirsch, church planting, missional church