My Photo

Subscribe

2008 Reads (so far)

Gospel

August 29, 2007

The Key to Sanctification

What is the key to sanctification? The answer is simple, but not simplistic. The key to sanctification is the gospel. Even more specifically, the key to sanctification is the cross.

I think one of the greatest weapons in Satan's arsenal is showing us how far we've come. When someone first becomes a Christian, especially one who is saved out of a life of gross sin, they typically have a pretty accurate view of their self. They don't look down on very many people because they recognize their self as having just been rescued from their own sin and are therefore overjoyed by the abundance of grace that has been shown to them. Rather than looking down, they typically look up. They look up to at Jesus; they look up at other Christians; they look up in general; but, they rarely look down.

Then something happens. Time. As time goes on, so does the memory of their sin. Along with the memory of their sin goes the memory of the cross. The cross is still present in their songs, around their neck, and in their testimony of when they became a Christian, however, it is no longer a daily reality. They stench of their sin has weakened and therefore so has the horror of the cross with its stench--the stench of a beaten, bloody, and dying man.

How does this happen? We become one of the people that we look up to. We become a "more mature" believer with "more time" under our belt. Worse yet, we become pastors who stand looking down at "poor sinners" as we point them to the cross. In the end, we stop looking up and we start looking down.

Once this happens, real sanctification ceases. Now, that doesn't mean that we stop being moral or that we quit gaining in theological knowledge. What it means is that we begin to equate our morality and our theological knowledge with sanctification. This concept of sanctification leads to pride because we become the key to sanctification. We are more faithful than others and therefore we are more moral than others. We are more disciplined than others and therefore we are more knowledgeable than others. This leads to our looking down. We begin to look down from our perch high in the tree of morality and theological insight. Too bad we can't see far enough down. If we could, we would see the roots of the tree and they would read, "Self-Righteous", and we would recognize ourselves to be in the same tree that the Pharisees and Sadducees once sat in. The same tree that they looked down upon Jesus from. We would discover around us a company of very proud people who have erased the memory of the tree on which Jesus was crucified.

While seated in our tree of self-righteousness, if we were to shift our gaze up instead of down, we would quickly be knocked off our perch and fall hard and fast to the ground below. Why? Because we would discover true righteousness in the face of God. Calvin said, "Again, it is certain that man never achieves a clear knowledge of himself unless he first looked upon God's face, and then descends from contemplating him to scrutinize himself. For we always seem to ourselves righteous and upright and wise and holy--this pride is innate in all of us--unless by clear proofs we stand convinced of our own unrighteousness, foulness, folly, and impurity. Moreover, we are are not thus convinced if we look merely to ourselves and not also to the Lord, who is the sole standard by which this judgment must be measured. For, because all of us are inclined by nature to hypocrisy, a kind of empty image of righteousness in place of righteousness itself abundantly satisfies us."

It is this knowledge of God's holiness and our sinfulness that leads us to the cross. Really there is no other place that it can lead us to. Surely such knowledge will not lead us to further pursue our own morality. Our own morality, at best, will still prove absurd when looking up instead of down. The more we contemplate God's holiness, the more the truth of our own wickedness becomes. The more we contemplate our own wickedness, the more the truth of God's holiness becomes. The two work together, in tandem, always. You cannot consider one without the other. Such consideration leaves us with nowhere to run. Rather, just as with Bunyan's Pilgrim, it intensifies the weight of our burden until we cannot move at all, much less run. And it is here, in this condition, that we finally stumble and fall. We fall to our knees and as we lift our heads we see the cross. It is here at the cross that our burden--God's holiness and our sinfulness--rolls away.

The more our knowledge of God's holiness increases and the more our knowledge of our own sin increases the larger the chasm becomes. Thankfully, the cross becomes larger and larger as it fills the chasm and provides us not only a place of justification, but a place of sanctification and glorification as well. The key to our sanctification is the gospel. If we are going to become more like Jesus, we will do so at the foot of the cross as grace flows down.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

August 14, 2007

Think about Judgment Day

About a year ago, I picked up the book "The Heart of a Servant Leader: Letters from Jack Miller". The back of the book reads:

These pastoral letters serve as models of compassionate leadership. Jack Miller taught that a Christian leader should be the chief servant, and that right attitudes come only from a heart changed by an encounter with God. Miller leads his reader into a deeper understanding of the gospel and a life of humility, faith, and prayer.

Miller gently challenges those called to serve as leaders to find their primary motivation in the glory of God alone. Miller's letters provide counsel on: ministry issues, overcoming sin, spiritual warfare, physical suffering, and learning to forgive.

I cannot tell you how much I have enjoyed reading many of the letters contained in this book. I always find myself challenged and encouraged when reading a few letters when I have spare time, or when I'm searching for mature gospel-centered wisdom. This morning I read something that really hit home in a letter written to a pastor who is trying to make an important life decision.

I'd also encourage you to do more thinking about the glorious appearing of our great God and Savior Jesus Christ. Think about Judgment Day. Clear thinking about that Day can do a lot to clear the head and the heart of the fear of people. I can get unconsciously bogged down by awareness of what people think, worried about my reputation, my success and failures, and forget about the only One who can evaluate me, and that is the Lamb on the throne.

I wonder how often we, especially pastors, fail to consider this. Do we preach with an awareness of what people think or with an awareness of what Jesus' thinks? Do we make decisions based on obedience to Jesus or based on the fear of what others may think of us? Miller goes on to write:

It's surprising in a secularized age how many people really wake up when you call them to that great Final Accounting. It has a way of affecting me positively, because it will all come out in the wash there when we fall on our faces before the Great White Throne. What force such awareness gives to the glad tidings of free justification by faith alone. Here I can know that Christ has taken my "doom" upon himself ("doom" is the language of the Last Judgment used in Rom. 8:1). "There is therefore no more doom for those in Christ Jesus"!

This should provide us with boldness to obey the Lord without fear of what others think. In the end the only think that will matter is that Jesus has died for my sin and is the risen Lord who frees me from both the penalty and power of sin.

Technorati Tags: ,

August 01, 2007

Free Will Song

I'm amazed by people who find the most bizarre stuff on YouTube. Actually I'm more amazed by the people who find this stuff then the people who make this stuff. My friend sent me this today and I watched it thinking to myself, "How does he find this stuff?!"

I've been fascinated by the passionate responses that have come to the post "What do our buildings witness to?" I get the impression that some people feel as if I hate buildings -- I don't. I get the impression that some people feel as if Howard A. Snyder is a recent guy caught up in a fad -- he's not. I also get the impression that I struck a nerve -- I did. I think it can best be summarized by a recent comment on the post "Missional Church Planting in Your Eighties!" The second commenter on that post wrote, "11 comments so far on church buildings, and only 1 on an 80-something church planter! Isn't there something a tad inappropriate about what provokes us to respond!" Yes, I agree.

With that in mind, I'm sure that this video is sure to cause equal disgust. I know that because there is one thing that people hate to be challenged more than their traditions, that is their free will. This is a song about free will. First of all, musically, it is just not very good. I don't mean that to be harsh. I'm just stating that as art it is very poor. It confirms what Franky Schaeffer said in the title of his book, we are Addicted to Mediocrity. But more importantly, theologically it is God belittling. The song claims that God is gracious because he gives us freedom to make choices and then holds us responsible for those choices. How is that gracious? Left to myself I would not only be held responsible for all of my miserable choices, I would also be held responsible for the choice of rejecting Jesus. My hard heart would never repent and my blind eyes would never see the beauty of the resurrected Christ as the One who has died for my sin, in my place, as my substitute, in order to liberate me from the bondage of my will.

The song says, "I could command your love, I own you twice. But only willing love is worth the price." This is a terrible view of the atonement. This is saying that love for God out of our own willing heart is the only love for God that is worth the price. What price? I'm assuming that means the price of Jesus' blood. I'm curious to know then, which sinner who has ever been redeemed has been worth the price of Jesus' blood? Who is it that has ever willingly fallen out of love with their self and fallen into love with Jesus? Which of us has ever removed our heart of stone and replaced with a heart of flesh? If you claim to have done so, then you are glorious. You are better than your rotten neighbor who hates God and just can't seem to "get it." If he were like you, he'd figure it out. Is that really what salvation leads to? Boasting in our turning from sin and self to Jesus? Did God risk it all by sending his Son to save people, all the while sitting back and biting his eternal fingernails hoping that someone would be overcome by his demonstration of love and repent? Not a chance! The only one biting his finger nails was Satan as he watched the heel of Christ come crushing down upon his head. God did not RISK Jesus in the hope that some would turn by a demonstration of love. God GAVE Jesus knowing that his people would turn to him because of the finality of the cross and the power of the gospel!

I'm sure that this sounds like a rant. It is. By definition a rant is to speak or shout at length in a loud impassioned way. Christians should not be addicted to mediocrity when it comes to art and especially not when it comes to the gospel. The gospel is not about a mediocre God with mediocre love and mediocre power. The gospel is about an awesome God with awesome love and awesome power!

Technorati Tags: , , ,

July 20, 2007

What difference does the Spirit make?

I am currently preaching through the book of Acts in our church. It has been very convicting. I have come to conclude that I do not often consider the fact that the Apostles were filled with the same Spirit that I am, and they preached the same gospel that I preach. This means that the power source in the Apostles' ministry is the same as mine, or should be, and is also the same as all who have become part of God's new covenant people through the gospel. I do not consider this very often and therefore probably don't think of my ministry as being driven by the same power. This is tragic.

Yesterday, I was reading Jack Miller's account of his own struggle with this realization.

My understanding of God and His commitment to supply the Holy Spirit was shallow and intellectualistic. I was especially afraid of anything in worship or prayer that might be emotional or what I saw as "spooky." At bottom, it was a matter of trust. I relied heavily--sometimes almost entirely--on my mind as a Christian thinker and on my hard work as a pastor. Prayer and what the apostle Paul calls "the fellowship of the Spirit" were "dispensable supplements" for me as a pastor. What really mattered for me was frequent and regular visiting of people, studying the Bible carefully, preaching biblical truths with contemporary relevance, and often using the media to publicize the programs of our local church. In all this I had a naive confidence that biblical truths clearly expressed would almost automatically change lives. "Outgrowing the Ingrown Church"

My guess is that most of us in the Reformed tradition find ourselves struggling with this same issue. How often have I relied entirely on my mind as a Christian thinker? How often have I relied entirely on my hard work as a pastor? This leads to a tough question: What difference does the Spirit make? The truth is that a lot of days, probably most days, I would be embarrassed to answer the question. This could not be said of the Apostles. Time and again we find the Apostles, once timid and quiet, as bold and vocal witnesses to the resurrected Christ. Acts 4 tells us that they were uneducated men, meaning that they had no formal theological education in Rabbinic Law. It also tells us that the formally trained religious leaders took note that these men had been with Jesus. They recognized that these men had walked with Jesus of Nazareth and heard his claims and now proclaimed in him the resurrection from the dead. All of this we are told was due to their being filled with the Holy Spirit. It was the Spirit empowered preaching of the gospel that led 5,000 men to believe on Jesus after Peter's sermon. It is the same Spirit empowered preaching of the gospel that leads anyone to believe on Jesus today. That leaves me wondering why we rely on anything else.

I'm sure that there are a number of reasons for our lack of dependance upon the Holy Spirit. None of those reasons make it right. So once again we are brought to a place of brokenness and left in need of the gospel. Adam relied upon his own reasoning rather than trusting God. The irreligious lost person and the religious lost person both rely upon their own understanding. Right alongside of Adam and lost people of all sorts we find Christian pastors trusting their own reasoning and understanding rather than the indwelling Spirit of God. What is the answer? The gospel. Once again we discover that the gospel is just as much for believers as it is for non-believers. The gospel, specifically the cross, tells us that we are helpless and in need of grace. The more I meditate on the gospel the more I am aware of my need of grace. The more that grace has its way with me the more I become aware of the Spirit. The more I become aware of the Spirit, the more I learn to become aware of those times that I am operating in my own strength rather than the power of the Spirit. The gospel reminds me of the difference the Spirit makes. He makes all the difference in the world.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

July 18, 2007

Confusing the Gospel

I think this is an excellent distinction between the gospel and the things that go hand in hand with it, from Graeme Goldsworthy's book "Gospel-Centered Hermeneutics: Foundations and Principles of Evangelical Biblical Interpretation".

The gospel is what we must believe in order to be saved. To believe the gospel is to put one's trust and confidence in the person and work of Jesus Christ as Saviour and Lord. To preach the gospel is faithfully to proclaim that historical event, along with the God-given interpretation of that event. It cannot be stressed too much that to confuse the gospel with certain important things that go hand in hand with it is to invite theological, hermeneutical and spiritual confusion. Such ingredients of preaching and teaching that we might want to link with the gospel would include the need for the gospel (sin and judgment), the means of receiving the benefits of the gospel (faith and repentance), the results or fruits of the gospel (regeneration, conversion, sanctification, glorification) and the results of rejecting it (wrath, judgment, hell). These, however we define and proclaim them, are not in themselves the gospel. If something is not what God did in and through the historical Jesus two thousand years ago, it is not the gospel. Thus Christians cannot 'live the gospel', as they are often exhorted to do. They can only believe it, proclaim it and seek to live consistently with it. Only Jesus lived (and died) the gospel. It is a once-for-all finished and perfected event done for us by another.

Technorati Tags: ,

July 05, 2007

John Piper on the Prosperity Gospel

In classic Piper fashion, I watched this and wanted to love God more. It also made me sad because I know how frequently I love my treasures more than I treasure God. What a way to start my day.

Technorati Tags: ,

June 19, 2007

Believing and Living the Gospel

This week I will be teaching from Acts 2:42-47. This is such a powerful text as it focuses on the earliest Christian community and their commitment to one another and the resulting impact of the gospel mission. While thinking about this subject and doing some reading, I couldn't help but think about how right Lesslie Newbigin was when he said:

I have come to feel that the primary reality of which we have to take account in seeking for a Christian impact on public life is the Christian congregation. How is it possible that the gospel should be credible, that people should come to believe that the power which has the last word in human affairs is represented by a man hanging on a cross? I am suggesting that the only answer, the only hermeneutic of the gospel, is a congregation of men and women who believe it and live by it. I am, of course, not denying the importance of the many activities by which we seek to challenge public life with the gospel - evangelistic campaigns, distribution of Bibles and Christian literature, conferences, and even books such as this one. But I am saying that these are all secondary, and that they have power to accomplish their purpose only as they are rooted in and lead back to a believing community.

Notice this phrase, "a congregation of men and women who believe [the gospel] and live by it." The earliest Christian community of the book of Acts not only believed the gospel (Acts 2:41), but they lived by it (Acts 2:42-47). I wonder how many of our churches are truly gospel centered communities who both believe the gospel and live by the gospel? What would it look like if our churches truly began to live like the earliest Christian communities of Acts 2? It would certainly look like a radical commitment to Jesus as both Lord and Christ (Acts 2:36). It would certainly look like a radical commitment to the people of the Lord (Acts 2:44-45). I'm also certain that it would be so foreign to what we know as church today that we probably would not know what to call it.

Maybe what this means is that we should examine what we know as church today and think of something else to call it.

Technorati Tags: , ,

June 18, 2007

Missional Neighbor

Our church is very intentional about church being the missional community of God's people and not being a location or an event. A couple of weeks ago we all committed to pray for our neighbors in a very focused sort of way. We exchanged names with one another and I happened to get Casey Bedell's names. The paper read, "Blonde Girl and Spanish Girl." So, for the past couple of weeks I have been praying for a "blonde girl and spanish girl" without knowing their names. Today I read Casey's blog and was encouraged by what he had posted. Being missional is not a reprogramming of church, it is a rethinking of the very nature of the gospel.

Here's Casey's post:

Recently my pastor Mark Moore asked me about my neighbors. I ashamedly looked down to the ground and said, "yeah, I have two neighbors, blondy and spanish." Sadly thats all I knew about them, ones hair color and ones ethnicity. But recently I got the courage to get to know my neighbors, well one of the two at least. (read more)

Technorati Tags: , ,

June 13, 2007

How does the gospel relate to work and vacation?

Some of you have pointed out that it has been very quiet on my blog recently. Yes, it has--not because I am tired of blogging--not because I have forgotten about blogging--not because I have not been thinking and therefore have nothing interesting to say. The truth is that I'm just busy. I was gone for half the month of May, both for mission and vacation. First, I spent a week in Sheffield with The Crowded House; you can read all the details on my blog. Next, I spent a week in California on vacation with my family. Finally, I spent the last week catching up on everything that comes with being gone for two weeks.

Isn't it funny how just before vacation everything seems to be building up and you just can't wait to get out of town? Isn't it sad that when you come back it is all still there and what was building up has now fallen over because the pile is too high? Typically this causes us to feel defeated and question whether or not we should have ever gone on vacation. Sadly, I know so many people that feel this way that they never take vacation. This is especially true of pastors who feel that they need to be there or everything will fall apart. This is a gospel issue.

Maybe we put too much expectation in vacation. We assume that "escaping" will provide us the necessary recharging of our batteries to power ourselves through the daily grind of life. Like some sort of supercharge that allows us to get a booster each weekend as we take a day off. In this way, vacation becomes for us a "functional savior."

Often times we go on vacation and come back feeling as if we need a vacation (I made this statement recently). This is because we go out of town and then go, go, go, from sunrise to sunset. We chase our kids, spend our money, and sleep less than at home. By the time it is over we feel tired, broke, and worn thin. We come home disappointed that "vacation did not work." Upon returning to work, we find our work stacked up and falling over into a big mess and this causes us to regret our vacation completely. Our kids barely see us after we get back and we explain that we just spent a whole week with them. In general, we become more tired, broke, and worn thin than we were before. Our prayer life and devotional life begins to suffer and we continue on this way until next year's vacation, at which time we have renewed hope that vacation will save us.

All of this points to a deeper spiritual issue--a gospel issue. Our true rest is found in Christ alone. Jesus says, "Abide in me, and I in you. As the branch cannot bear fruit by itself, unless it abides in the vine, neither can you, unless you abide in me." It is this continual abiding in Jesus that provides us true rest, and therefore constant charging of the batteries. Vacations are a wonderful thing and, yes, work is a wonderful thing. God created us to work even before sin entered the world. Work is not a result of the Fall, but a result of being created in the image of God as stewards of His creation. Despising our work because it is a life of toil is the result of the Fall. Hard work therefore should be a permanent reminder of the gospel. We should be reminded that our work is hard and that it takes its toll on our bodies, both physically and mentally, because we live in a fallen world. Our work rebels against us just as we rebelled against God. Each act of rebellion should remind us of God's grace and mercy to us in the gospel. Christ has died for us while we were yet still sinners, not because we were making progress. We never make progress outside of the gospel and therefore never move on from the gospel. We live in it. Abide in it. Work in it and vacation in it.

Vacation is a wonderful time because we do get to spend time with our friends and family, travel, relax, escape from work, etc. However, we should never overestimate its role. Its role is not to save us from our work. Jesus saves us in the midst of our daily work as we abide in him. So I do not mind the busyness that comes from being gone for a couple of weeks. I enjoy my work and I enjoy my rest. My rest is Christ and by abiding in him I constantly find rest whether at work or on vacation.

Back to work!

Technorati Tags: , ,

May 10, 2007

The Gospel...Everyday

Here is an excellent paragraph. Let this one stay with you for a while.

The gospel, applied to our hearts every day, frees us to be brutally honest with ourselves and with God. The assurance of His total forgiveness of our sins through the blood of Christ means we don't have to play defensive games anymore. We don't have to rationalize and excuse our sins. We can say we told a lie instead of saying we exaggerated a bit. We can admit an unforgiving spirit instead of continuing to blame our parents for our emotional distress. We can call sin exactly what it is, regardless of how ugly and shameful it may be, because we know that Jesus bore that sin in His body on the cross. With the assurance of total forgiveness through Christ, we have no reason to hide from our sins anymore. -- The Discipline of Grace, Jerry Bridges

Technorati Tags: , ,