My Photo

Subscribe

2008 Reads (so far)

Film

May 12, 2007

The Meatrix

Last night my wife and I rented the movie Fast Food Nation, based on the book Fast Food Nation. After watching this movie, I'm not sure that I will ever be able to eat fast food again. Honestly, I'm not sure that the lifestyle I have created for myself will allow me to make such a commitment and actually follow through with it. Maybe that is an indicator that my lifestyle is not the best that it could be. In any case, when the movie was over I was so intrigued that I switched over to the special features on the DVD to see what I might find to further gross me out. What I found was a rare gem. An excellent combination of wit, creativity, education, humor, and intrigue. This gem is called The Meatrix. It is a clever play on The Matrix, and is meant to expose the horrors of the fast food industry. There are three mini-movies that I promise you will love. They are linked below and I encourage you to watch all three. You may finish and then run out and grab a Big Mac, but no matter what, I promise you will not enjoy your Big Mac as much as you did before.

Clicking on the links below will take you to each of the movies listed.

The Meatrix I

The Meatrix II: Revolting

The Meatrix II 1/2.

Technorati Tags: ,

April 24, 2007

Reading, Watching, and Thinking

I thought I would take a brief moment and ramble about some random things going on in my life. I guess what made me decide to do this was an announcement slide in church this past Sunday. As I was checking out the slides on the screen, one flashed up pointing everyone to my blog and said something to the effect of, "Check out Mark's blog to see what he is reading, watching, and thinking about." So, here is my attempt to make the slide look true and me to look like a real blogger.

Reading
This coming Sunday I am starting a new series in the book of Acts, so my reading is somewhat heavily weighted in that area. Below are some books that I have either recently read or am currently reading. The list is not in any particular order, just as I look around my desk and see them lying there. It is also not exhaustive, though I'm sure to many it appears exhausting.


"The Acts of the Apostles : A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary" (Ben Witherington III)


"The Message of Acts: The Spirit, the Church, and the World (Bible Speaks Today)" (John R. W. Stott)


"The Book of the Acts (New International Commentary on the New Testament)" (Frederick Fyvie Bruce)


"The Message of Acts in the History of Redemption" (Dennis E. Johnson)


"Authentic Christianity (Lloyd-Jones, David Martyn. Studies in the Book of Acts, V. 1.)" (Martyn Lloyd-Jones)


"Acts of the Apostles an Introduction and Commenta (Tyndale New Testament Commentaries)" (I.Howard Marshall)


"Paul's Idea of Community: The Early House Churches in Their Cultural Setting, Revised Edition" (Robert J. Banks)


"Going to Church in the First Century" (Robert Banks)


"Acts and the History of Earliest Christianity" (Martin Hengel)


"The Rise of Christianity: How the Obscure, Marginal, Jesus Movement Became the Dominant Religious Force ...." (Rodney Stark)

Watching
Often times on Mondays, a day off for me, I will watch a movie while my kids are at school and my wife is at the gym. Yes, it really is as terrible as it sounds; I sit in my robe and drink a pot of coffee watching a movie while my wife works out. Yesterday I watched The Last King of Scotland, which was excellent. In previous weeks I have watched Blood Diamond, The Office (Seasons 1 & 2), and Broken Trail. At the theater, I recently saw Shooter, 300, and Disturbia.

As for television, I am a self-confessed 24 fanatic. This has caused me great distress because with each week I grow more and more disappointed with this season and hope that I am not witnessing the demise of one of my favorite shows. This could also be due to the fact that some new shows have stepped in and captured my attention this year. My favorite is Friday Night Lights. This show is centered around a small town Texas high school football team, but is not really about football. It is about life. Week in and week out, this show tackles some of the most pressing issues in our culture and does so with clarity and boldness (such issues have included: racism, adultery and divorce, teenage sexuality, rape, steroid use, domestic violence, etc.). The show received critical acclaim, but it lagged far behind in the ratings. I can only hope that it comes back for another season as it far surpasses the joke that is American Idol. Friday Night Lights is over for the season; if you did not catch it, I highly recommend you grab it on iTunes or on DVD when it is released.

Thinking
What have I been thinking about? Wow! Where to begin? I've been thinking about all of the books above and then some. I've been thinking about how happy I am to go to a movie with my wife each week so that I can quit thinking about what I am reading. I've been thinking about church planting--a lot! I've been consumed with thinking about how to plant at least 100 churches in the Dallas/Ft. Worth Metroplex, as well as helping guys plant churches in Europe.

I've also been thinking about shaving. I know it sounds random, but I never knew that there was such a major interest in "wet shaving." Don't believe me? Just type in wet shaving on google and watch what pops up. You will be amazed! Well, ok, maybe not amazed at wet shaving itself, but at least amazed that there is so much interest in it. I'm sure you want to know why I was searching wet shaving on google. Well the truth is I was searching ingrown hairs on google. One thing led to another and before you know it I was sucked into a subcultural maze of men devoted to the lost art of wet shaving. Within a couple of articles you discover all about DE safety razors, the importance of pre-shave prep, glycerin based creams, and above all...the badger hair brush. There is even an entire collection of YouTube videos on wet shaving. Maybe I'll shave more frequently now.

Well, I'm sure that is far more information than you ever really wanted to know about me and what I have been reading, watching, and thinking about. Needless to say, I felt like a real blogger when I typed all of that. Blessings.

Technorati Tags: , ,

December 11, 2006

The Nativity Story

My wife and I recently saw The Nativity Story.  Let me be honest, I typically despise “Christian movies.”  They generally are the poorest reflection of artistic quality that can be found.  The Passion of the Christ was released in the same year as The Gospel of John.  The Gospel of John lasted about five minutes in the theater before being widely promoted to churches by direct mail hailing its DVD release.  Why did The Passion of the Christ work when so many other “Christian” films had failed?  Simple, an Academy Award winner produced it rather than a Christian with a video camera who possessed no talent. 

The Passion was artistically beautiful to watch.  Sadly, many Christians feel that they can produce a second-rate piece of junk and the beauty of the truth that it attempts to display will overshadow the poor quality of the art itself.  The producers of such art then rely on grassroots movements to “talk up” the film and get people to the theaters.  Such efforts are not needed to beckon children from every generation to return to the pages containing the magical land of Narnia.  Nor does one need coaxing to stand in the Sistine Chapel as their chin rests on the floor while their eyes are glued to the ceiling.  Before I get too carried away, I simply want to make the point that Christians should think through a biblical view of art (I recommend Schaeffer and Rookmaaker).

Enter The Nativity Story.  Under no circumstances would I add this film to the great films of history.  At the same time, under no circumstances would I add this film to the category of typical “Christian” movie junk.  So here are the four things that impressed me the most about this film.  They are the reasons that I hope others will see this film as quality art.

First, the film felt like Israel in the first century.  To begin with, the actors did not look like they had come from Norway.  I grow so tired of seeing films about Jesus in which Mary looks more like Demi Moore than a teenage girl of Jewish descent.  The actors had dark complexion and facial features that reflected the people you would expect to see if transported to Nazareth in the first century.  Furthermore, the set and costume design aided in the process of realism.  You could easily see how poor these people were and the great disparity that existed between the rich king, the Roman soldiers, and the oppressed people.  The sights and sounds of the movie swept you into the setting.

Second, the film captured the real issues.  Someone in this project had a good understanding of the issues facing first century Jews.  The idea of a political Messiah was prevalent from start to finish.  Herod was not interested in someone who was going to be born simply to take people to heaven when they die.  He was very interested in someone who was going to displace him from his throne.  The Jewish people as well were looking for one who would displace the Romans and restore peace and prosperity to the nation.  In one particular scene, a group of Roman soldiers ride through on horses treating the people harshly.  From the crowd you can hear cries of, “The Messiah will come!”  At times I wondered if N.T. Wright books were lying around next to the directors chair.

Third, the film made me love Mary and have great respect for Joseph.  There was such a youthful innocence to Mary that was mixed with fear of giving birth and resolve to be obedient to the Lord.  You could not help but love her.  Joseph, in my mind, was the one that stole the show.  I found myself growing in my admiration and respect for Joseph as the film went on.  If Joseph were a man of character like the movie portrayed him to be, and the Bible’s few comments about him, then I saw in him the type of man that women long for and children need.  I’m sure that Jesus not only blessed them, but they blessed Jesus.

Finally, the film had artistic creativity.  While the film was pleasing to watch, both in quality and in realism, it was also creative in subtle ways that characterize good art.  The one that sticks out most in my mind is a scene in which Mary is riding in the back of a carriage facing backwards towards the road.  As the carriage is passing through some trees you notice two men that have been hung on the trees, crucified, on both sides of the path.  Marry passes right between the two men and you catch the subtle hint of Jesus between two thieves.  This is the sort of creativity in art that is painfully missing from most “Christian” films.

In conclusion, I hope that many of you will see this film during the holiday season and that it will help you to think deeper about the story of Christmas while engaging your emotions with the beauty of Christmas.

September 22, 2006

The Jesus Camp: An Accurate Assessment

Cut to the flickering images of children writhing in a spiritual trance on a chapel floor while being hectored about the glory of dying for Christ, and one knows exactly where the first Christian suicide bombers will come from. (Chris Barsanti, Film Journal International)

Evangelicalism's views on science and politics are so polarizing that almost any viewer, whether Orthodox, agnostic, or atheist, is bound to have an elemental reaction from the first shot of six-year-olds weeping in religious ecstasy. (Sara Brady, Premier Magazine)

Needless to say, The Jesus Camp, a new film directed by Heidi Ewing and Rachel Grady, has created quite a buzz in the world of independent film.  For those of you who are unfamiliar with the film, the following is a brief synopsis from the film’s website, www.jesuscampthemovie.com, where you can also find the film’s trailer along with other video clips.

A growing number of Evangelical Christians believe there is a revival underway in America whereby Christian youth must take up the leadership of the conservative Christian movement.

JESUS CAMP, directed by Heidi Ewing and Rachel Grady (The Boys of Baraka), follows Levi, Rachael, Tory and a number of other young children to Pastor Becky Fischer's Kids on Fire summer camp in Devil's Lake, North Dakota, where kids as young as 6 years-old are taught to become dedicated Christian soldiers in God's army.

The film follows these children at camp as they hone their prophetic gifts and are schooled in how to take back America for Christ. The film is a first-ever look into an intense training ground that recruits born-again Christian children to become an active part of America's political future.

Yesterday afternoon, I watched the film with a good friend of mine.  At the ticket booth the guy was quick to comment on our choice of entertainment for the afternoon and informed us that everyone from a “Baptist Minister” to a group of “homeschoolers” had been to see the movie.  We were the only ones in the theater until the last minute when we were joined by a man and woman who talked throughout the movie as if they were at a noisy bar.  Their comments ranged from, “Oh you’ve got to be kidding me,” to, “That’s sick!”  In between the jeering remarks, the woman continually made noises ranging from uncontrollable laughter to something resembling a cat that had just been backed over in the garage.  To be honest with you, I’m sure the cat probably felt better with his recent acquisition of tire imprints than this lady felt with her recent acquisition of image imprints.  The images on screen were at times enough to cause nausea in doctors who normally spend their days performing colonoscopies.

What were these images?  Try six year olds in trances while “speaking in tongues.”  Or, try a young boy writhing on the floor in something resembling a grand mal seizure.  All of this, of course, was attributed to the Holy Spirit.  Or, try children using hammers to smash coffee cups with the word “government” written on them.  The purpose of this cup smashing was to “break the demonic bondage in the heavenlies.”  Whatever that means?!

Before I continue I think it is important to address the issue, which will be raised, regarding the integrity of the film.  Many of you will wonder if the film “accurately portrayed” the ministry being presented in this film.  Kids in Ministry International, the ministry of Becky Fischer, has a website that promotes the film and provides an interview with Fischer about the film.  She speaks directly to the issue of being fairly portrayed in the film:

Am I saying I like everything in the film and 100% of the way we've been portrayed? Of course not. This movie is merely a snapshot of what we do with children and does not in any way represent our entire ministry. There's no way you can do that in an 84 minute documentary and still have a movie people want to go and see. But we feel it's fair. They show both sides of the issue without making judgments on either side. They let us speak for ourselves, even if you don't get to hear complete thoughts and sentences and concepts.

I am just as sick and tired of secular media painting Christians in a skewed, negative light as every other Christian is. And when I watch the trailer I know what it must seem like to Christians---"Here we go again! One more movie that bashes Christians!"

But I'm asking you to give the movie a chance. At least see it before you make a judgment. I honestly feel it's a fair look into what we do.


Those do not sound like the words of one claiming that the film misrepresents them.  Rather, it is an encouragement to Christians that they should go and see the film.  As a matter of fact, it becomes obvious that the film seems to be great marketing for her in charismatic circles.  Her site also includes comments that she has posted from those who have seen the film and sent her emails.  These are not the words of angry Christians who are upset with filmmakers making a joke of Christianity:

“Just saw the film "Jesus Camp" yesterday. It moved us to tears. 
Such a powerful film of how to train up our children in the way they should go.  Thank you!!”

“My husband, Michael, and I saw JESUS CAMP Saturday evening and left spellbound and in tears. Your ministry is simply incredible and it is a ‘forerunner’ for sure!! We are grandparents of four and pray that one day our grandchildren could be exposed to this type of ministry. We bless you, Becky, and pray that your boldness and enthusiasm to see our children spiritually trained and sold out for Christ will flourish and not wane. You are a gifted woman called to shake status quo in the Church, so .......... go girl in the mighty name of Jesus Christ!!!!!!!”

“When will the next Jesus Camp open because I WANT TO GO TO JESUS CAMP!!! I mean I'll go like half the summer if I need to. And do you do anything with the children after the age of 12? I ask because there aren't organizations that I know of that can compare to what you do with young people today, because what happens to the kids? With teens it's like the organizations say, "Go deeper with Christ!" and things, but 1) most teens might only know a few stories or may know nothing at all, and 2) no one takes that time to explain to us teenagers what they mean to get deep…We teens don't get taught how to do so many things you do like speak in tongues, hear God's ever present steady voice, heal the sick, witness to people....so many things. When will someone come along and teach me how to talk to Jesus through the Spirit?” Sunshine, age 15

   

I include these comments in order to show the sort of positive response that is stemming from this strand of the evangelical church.  What would appear strange and bizarre to the woman sitting in the theater with me appears accurate and “anointed” to the charismatic Christian who watches this film.  I personally felt that the film honestly portrayed what I find to be common in most Pentecostal churches.

If I chose to respond to everything I took issue with theologically it would wind up being too much to sort through.  My biggest concern as I watched this movie was the lady in the theater and countless others like her throughout America.  She, and the man she was with, had just been exposed to a strand of Christianity that is extremely foreign to the New Testament.

I wondered what thoughts went through her mind as Becky Fischer strolled across the screen offering up her contaminated theology.  At times the movie appeared to be a comedy, at other times a horror film.  It was very comedic when Becky proclaimed to these young children that people are too fat and lazy to fast because they don’t want to give up a meal—funny material from one that is more than a bit overweight.  It was funny to see a cardboard cutout of George W. Bush brought into the service with a big American flag draped behind him while the children were told to speak blessings over the President as the woman leading the service “spoke in tongues” and laid hands on the cardboard cutout.

Of course you couldn’t make a movie about Christian children’s ministry without the typical jab at Harry Potter.  Only this time it was more than a jab.  Becky remarked that Harry Potter would be put to death if he lived “in the Old Testament” because he was a warlock.  Perhaps my favorite of all was the radio host who spoke about the evangelical Christian view of global warming.  What was that view?  “Rape this world, rape this earth, cut down these trees, use up all this oil, it doesn’t matter because Jesus is coming back to destroy this world!”  Time doesn’t permit explaining the red tape on the mouths of the children, or the homeschooling mom convincing her kid that global warming is a liberal ploy, or the God doesn’t like to go to dead churches theology stating that depending on how they invite God decides whether He’ll come or not.  You get the drift.

The movie, brilliantly made, was a ninety-minute nightmare that soon ended.  When the lights came up I was left realizing that the nightmare was a reality.  This wasn’t a movie that I walked away from saying, “Wow!  I’m glad he saved the world at the last minute.”  This was a movie I walked away from realizing, once again, how screwed up the American Church is.  The freak show on film is a reality in churches across America.  The evangelical authors that peddle this miserable brand of theology are on bestseller lists in every evangelical bookstore in America, not to mention daily television and radio appearances.  Good theology has gone out of print and theological churches have gone out of business.  Why?  They don’t entertain.  They are not exciting.  They are irrelevant.  Whose fault is this?  It is the fault of pastors and the seminaries that train them.

Seminaries are, for the most part, terrible at understanding the culture in which ministry is done.  While the seminary may be an expert in teaching the thinking and theology of great men of the past, they gravely mistake that we still live in the past alongside those men.  They fail to understand issues of contextualization and missional theology that is rooted in a deep understanding of the gospel.  As a result, they produce pastors that are as culturally irrelevant as the schools they attend.  Our churches are filled with pastors who understand the gap theory, but fail to see the gap between their church and the cultural context it exists in.

The truth is that no one takes the theologically astute church any more serious than they take Becky Fischer serious.  The theologically astute church reaches other irrelevant theologically astute people who exist in a Reformed Christian sub-culture while Becky Fischer reaches people who exist in an experience driven charismaniac sub-culture.  But note, they both reach those in a “sub-culture.”  Those who are involved in the culture in a more broad sense of the word are paying attention to neither one.  Pastors must study theology in order to understand the gospel, but they must also study culture in order to understand the people to whom the gospel must be preached.

Missionaries have known this for years.  They have studied foreign cultures in order to understand the prevailing philosophies and customs inherent to the indigenous people they have been sent to.  This can be no different for the church in America.  Pastors must be missiologists who understand the language and thought systems of the people in their culture in order to preach the gospel in a language that is understandable.  The problem by and large is that pastors have not considered the missional nature of church and have instead considered modern tactics of marketing in order to grow their churches to the size of a small country.  All good marketing targets a certain segment of society with the product being offered.  Most churches that operate through typical principles of church growth, market themselves to those in particular sub-cultures leaving the people in the broader culture complete unreached.

It really doesn’t matter to most pastors.  As long as they can impress their friends with the size of their church they are perfectly content to grow through inbreeding.  The result is that most churches with good theology grow through adding people with already good theology looking for a church with good theology (although I am not convinced of how good theology is if it lacks mission at its core).  Churches with bad theology, like Becky Fischer and her ministry, grow through adding people with bad theology.  The only difference is that they are unaware of their poor theology, yet are experts at reaching others with poor theology who are looking for a freak show because it is “anointed.”  The cycle goes on and on.

What is the answer?  Seminaries that are willing to come out of the dark ages in order to train pastors capable of contextualizing the gospel in their culture.  Those who are already pastors must be willing to do the hard work of studying—both theology and the cultural context in which they are doing theology.  It doesn’t do any good to answer questions that people are not asking.  We must discern the questions being asked and how the gospel answers those questions.  If church leaders are unwilling to do this, then they must accept their position in the shadow of irrelevance.  They must not look in disgust at a film like The Jesus Camp without looking with disgust upon themselves due to their own laziness.  They must not be offended at the mocking and scorning of secular society.  They are not mocking and scorning the gospel, but the church that represents that gospel.  They are mocking the evangelical ultra-right wing conservatives who have placed their hope in the Republican Party rather than the Kingdom of God.  They are mocking a powerless church that has more faith in the American Flag, hanging in its sanctuary, that they have pledged their allegiance to instead of the King before whom all nations bow.

A film like this is not simply an expose of the strange happenings in the Pentecostal Church.  It is an expose of the way the Church is viewed as ignorant, irrelevant, and powerless.  It is an accurate film.  It is an accurate assessment.

June 05, 2006

An Inconvenient Truth

There is a new movie out and it is causing quite a buzz.  No, I am not talking about The Da Vinci Code.  I am talking about a movie entitled An Inconvenient Truth.  The leading man is not Brad Pitt or Tom Cruise, but Al Gore.  Al Gore?  Yes, that's right.  It is a documentary about global warming and the direction that our planet is heading if we do not begin to adjust our lifestyles to take better care of the environment.

Film critic Roger Ebert says, "In 39 years, I have never written these words in a movie review, but here they are: You owe it to yourself to see this film. If you do not, and you have grandchildren, you should explain to them why you decided not to."

Let me state that I have not yet seen this film, but intend to.  I'm sure that if you are a conservative right-wing fundamentalist who hates the DNC than you are turning green.  After all, aren't all born-again Christians Republicans?  Why would a conservative pastor support an Al Gore film?  I mean come on, don't you know "that all those films have an agenda."  This is an attitude that Christians need to move beyond.  For the most part, I hear people say things like, "I won't go watch such and such.  They're not getting my money."  Cool.  Keep your $10.  I'm sure they'll go broke because of it.

The real inconvenient truth has been stated well by Dr. Roger Greenway, who was a Professor of World Missiology at Calvin Theological Seminary.  Dr. Greenway served as a missionary in Sri Lanka and Mexico.  He was a tenured Professor of Missions and Gospel Communication at Westminster Theological
Seminary and has written several works on urban missions.  He states:

"For decades [the church] have sung, 'This is my father's world,' while shrugging off the God-insulting misuse of air, water, soil, and space.  Largely due to pressure from secular forces there is now more concern for protecting the environment.  How sad that Christians were not in the forefront of the movement from the beginning!  And shame on those church planters who even now ignore the environmental questions when they choose new sites, design buildings, and pave parking lots.  We ought not to abuse our Father's world, even when pursuing the holy calling of planting churches."

This is an inconvenient truth.  Not only is it inconvenient, it is a disgrace.  Colossians 1:16 says, "For in Christ all things were created, in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities--all things were created through him and for him."  How can earth having been created by Jesus and for Jesus and given to Christians to steward and take care of be something that, for the most part, people who don't even worship Jesus are more concerned with.  It is an inconvenient and disgraceful truth to think that non-Christians have a higher view of Jesus' planet than Christians.

I pray that the gospel, as it sanctifies us, will lead us to value our planet in a way that we haven't done so before.